South Carolina Attorney General Confirms York County Council Has Authority to Revoke Silfab Permits
- silfabmove
- Jan 13
- 2 min read
A letter from the South Carolina Attorney General confirms what concerned residents have said from the beginning: York County Council does have the legal authority to revoke permits issued to Silfab Solar when public health and safety are at risk.
For months, York County residents were told through county staff statements and an official county news release that Council’s hands were tied. The public was repeatedly told that Council lacked authority to revoke Silfab’s permits and could not act because of pending litigation.
That statement was false.
Attorney General: Council Retains Power to Act
In clear, unambiguous language, the Attorney General explains that zoning decisions are a legislative function and that protecting public health and safety is a paramount concern of local government.
The letter confirms that:
York County Council retains police power authority to act when a permitted use threatens health, safety, or welfare
Reliance on previously issued permits does not override Council’s authority
There is no absolute vested right in a permit when credible safety risks exist
This legal analysis directly contradicts York County’s May 27 public statement, which told residents that Council had no power to revoke permits and that asking Council to act was “not viable.”
Council Was Given Incorrect Information
The Attorney General’s letter makes clear that York County Council was misled.
This matters because the York County Board of Zoning Appeals issued a unanimous ruling that Silfab’s proposed use does not belong in a Light Industrial zoning district. Despite that ruling, county staff continued issuing permits anyway.
At the same time, residents were told Council could do nothing.
That narrative is now officially disproven.
Independent Studies Confirm Real Safety Risks
Since the BZA ruling, independent health and engineering analyses conducted by the University of South Carolina have confirmed that Silfab’s facility presents real and credible risks, particularly due to its proximity to schools and nearby neighborhoods.
These findings reinforce the Attorney General’s position that Council not only has the authority to act, but also a responsibility to act when public safety is at stake.
What Happens Next Is a Choice
The Attorney General has made York County Council’s authority unmistakably clear.
✔️ Council can enforce the BZA ruling
✔️ Council can revoke permits issued in error
✔️ Council can act to protect public health and safety
The only question left is not whether Council can act. The question is whether they will.
Take Action
📌 Read the Attorney General’s letter
📌 Share these facts with your neighbors and community leaders
📌 Contact York County Council and demand enforcement of the BZA ruling
Accountability starts with informed citizens.
Move Silfab will continue pushing for transparency, lawful decision-making, and the protection of Fort Mill families, schools, and neighborhoods.



Comments